Eminent, prominent (adjs.)

這兩個形容詞都可用來指各行各業非常成功和知名的人士,但語意不盡相同。Eminent 意為「傑出的;卓越的;著名的」(尤指科學、醫學、學術或藝術等嚴謹工作領域出了名的人),如 He is one of the world’s most eminent scientists. (他是世界上最傑出的科學家之一)。Prominent 意為「重要的;知名的;顯赫的」,如 Mary had a prominent part in the soup opera. (瑪麗在這一連續劇中扮演一個重要的角色);The order was given by a prominent member of the government. (這一命令是由一名政府要員下達的)。

這兩個字的主要語意差異在於,eminent 含有受尊敬、受敬重的概念,譬如說,某位心臟移植醫生曾經在多項高難度的心臟移植手術上獲致成功,是該領域的權威,受到眾人的尊敬與推崇,我們就可用 eminent 來形容這位醫生,因為他的專業表現是卓越的、傑出的。至於 prominent 則主要在表示知名和重要的概念,譬如說,比爾蓋茲是電腦界知名的重要人物 (prominent figure)。

所以,a prominent person 不一定是 an eminent person,因為在科學、醫學、學術或藝術等領域上的卓越、出眾 (eminence),端賴是否受到眾人的認可、受人尊崇而定,而這是經由專業技能和教育所建立起來的。舉例來說,某位流行樂巨星可能是 prominent,因為舉世知名,但不一定是 eminent,因為他或她在科學和學術上或其他方面可能並無足以贏得眾人敬重的傑出表現。

此外,prominent 還有兩個意思是 eminent 所沒有的,其一是「顯而易見的;明顯的;顯眼的」(easy to see or notice),如 A single tree in a field is prominent. (田野中孤零零的一棵樹是很顯眼的);Place these items in a prominent position in your window display. (把這些東西擺放在櫥窗的顯眼位置)。其二是「突起的;凸出的」(sticking out),如 prominent cheekbones (突起的顴骨);Martin has a prominent nose. (馬丁有一個凸出的高鼻子)。

Canvas (n.), canvass (n., v.)

這兩個字發音相同,拼字僅一個字母之差,有時不免搞混,尤其是名詞複數時,一為 canvases,另一為 canvasses,稍一不慎就會把「馮京」看作「馬涼」。所幸,這兩個字的意思截然不同。

Canvas 僅當名詞用,意為「帆布;油畫布;帆布畫;油畫」,如 a canvas bag (帆布袋);We spent two months living under canvas. (我們在帳篷裡住了兩個月) - under canvas 為一英式英語片語,意為「在帳篷裡」(= in a tent);He bought the canvas for one thousand dollars. (他以一千美元買下這幅油畫);The artist showed us her canvases. (那位畫家給我們看了她的油畫)。

Canvass 可當動詞和名詞用。當動詞時,這個字可以是及物或不及物,意為「(向…) 遊說;(為…) 拉票」,如 The president has spent the day canvassing in Kaohsiung. (總統在高雄遊說了一天);He canvassed the district for votes. (他在選區裡拉票);Party supporters were called on to help canvass for their candidate. (該黨的支持者被動員來為候選人拉票);The justice minister has been canvassing support for his new crime bill. (法務部長一直在為新的刑事法案尋求支持)。

除上述外,當動詞用的 canvass 還意為「(廣泛) 徵詢 (意見);詳細或徹底地討論」,如 I’ve been canvassing the views of our members about the suggestions. (我一直在廣泛徵詢會員們對建議的看法);Various possibilities have been canvassed. (各種可能性都有討論)。至於當名詞用的 canvass,意為「遊說;拉票;討論」,如 door-to-door (or house-to-house) canvasses (挨家挨戶的拉票活動)。

Satisfactory, satisfying (adjs.)

這兩個字皆意為「令人滿意的」,如 He could not provide a satisfactory excuse for his being late. (他對自己的遲到提不出令人滿意的理由);The result is satisfying. (結果令人滿意)。既然意思相同,那麼它們豈非同義詞? 非也! 因為它們令人滿意的「程度」有頗大的差異。

Satisfactory 令人滿意的程度只是「尚可,差強人意」(acceptable, adequate, only just good enough, but not extremely good) 而已,而 satisfying 令人滿意的程度已達「心滿意足」(extremely good, meeting your needs or requirements)。例如:A satisfactory meal 是指這頓飯尚可,吃起來還算差強人意,而 a satisfying meal 則是指這頓飯非常豐盛,讓人吃起來心滿意足。

由於這兩個形容詞在許多情況中皆可修飾同一名詞,如 a satisfactory/satisfying arrangement/conclusion/meal/result (令人滿意的安排/結論/飯菜/結果),因此,唯有掌握它們之間的語意差異,方能適切地表達其真正的意含。譬如說,一般手機和智慧型手機 (smartphones) 相比之下,前者帶給使用者的「滿足感」充其量只能用 satisfactory feeling 來表示,而後者予人的「滿足感」,用 satisfying feeling 來表示,應是八九不離十了!

Maybe, perhaps

無論是英式英語或美式英語,這兩個副詞迄今都仍相當常用。它們不僅意思相同 (意為「也許,或許,大概,可能」),而且用法也幾無二致,兩者皆可當句子副詞 (sentence adverb),修飾整個句子或子句,亦可用作一般副詞 (ordinary adverb)。再者,它們皆可用來指過去、現在或未來事件。

所以,在絕大多數的情況中,maybe 和 perhaps 都可互換。不過,maybe 適合用於比較非正式的上下文,而 perhaps 則適合用於比較正式的場合;換言之,maybe 比較口語化。在美式英語中,maybe 比 perhaps 要常用得多。例如:

  • I can’t find the car key anywhere. Perhaps/Maybe I threw it away. (我到處找不到車鑰匙。也許我把它丟掉了)
  • There were perhaps as many as fifty badly wounded victims in the hospital. (醫院裡可能有多達 50 位重傷的受害者)
  • St Paul’s Cathedral is perhaps one of London’s most prominent landmarks. (聖保羅大教堂可能是倫敦最著名的地標之一)
  • Maybe you are right! Perhaps it would be best if you didn’t invite David. (也許你是對的! 如果你不邀請大衛,可能是最佳的作法)

值得一提的是,maybe 和 perhaps 皆可用於禮貌的建議或請求。例如:

  • Maybe we should meet sometime next week. (也許我們應該在下週某個時候見個面)
  • You could put it over here, maybe. (也許你可以把它放在這裡)
  • Perhaps you would like to join us for dinner. (也許你願意跟我們共進晚餐)
  • You’d better go now, perhaps. (你最好還是現在就走)

Begin, start, commence (vv.)

這三個動詞均意為「開始」,幾乎可視為同義詞,因為其含意僅 begin 和 start 之間有細微的差異。Begin 是最常用或最廣泛使用的字,但它僅表示某個動作、程序或過程的開始 (to set some action, process, or course in motion),如 Work on the new gym will begin next month. (建造新體育館的工作將於下月開始);My troubles began the moment I met Linda. (我的麻煩從我邂逅琳達那一刻就開始了)。

Start 在大多數情況中都可與 begin 互換,但 start 比較「明確」,凡是有身體動作或者動作、程序或過程有起點,一般都使用 start 來表示,如 The World Championships start in two weeks’ time. (世界錦標賽將在兩週後開始);They started a journey. (他們開始旅行了);We start work at 8.30 every morning. (我們每天早上八點半開始工作)。

Commence 的含意與 begin 完全相同,但前者是個正式用字,大多用在正式書面文件、正式儀式或其他正式場合中,或用來表示某種正式行動的「開始」,如 The lawyers are preparing for the trial, which commences in 30 days. (律師正在為這場將於 30 天後開始的審判進行準備);If everyone has arrived, the meeting may now commence. (如果人都到齊了,會議現在就可開始了)。

值得一提的是,begin, start 和 commence 當及物動詞時後面皆可接動名詞或不定詞。例如:

  • When did you begin learning/begin to learn English? (你何時開始學英文?)
  • When did you start to learn/start learning English? (你何時開始學英文?)
  • She commenced to cry/commenced crying. (她開始哭了起來)

然而,當 begin, start 或 commence 本身為進行式時,其後只能接不定詞,不可接動名詞。例如:

  • The buds were just beginning to open. (花蕾剛剛開始綻放)(正)
  • The buds were just beginning opening. (誤)

Intent (n., adj.), intention (n.)

Intent 當名詞用時與 intention 幾乎是同義詞,意為「意圖,目的」,但它們的用法和文法不盡相同。Intent 係用在比較正式的場合,如與法律和訴訟有關的上下文,而 intention 可用在許許多多不同的場合,是個平常用得比較多的字。再者,intent 為不可數名詞,後面經常接 to + 原形動詞,而 intention 為可數名詞,後面經常接 to + 原形動詞或 of + 動名詞。

所以,在報紙上,讀者可能會看到這樣的報導:He was carrying a gun with intent to commit a bank robbery. (他持槍想要搶銀行);The man was charged with intent to kill his girlfriend. (那名男子被控蓄意謀殺他女友)。

然而,在日常生活的會話中,您可能會聽到有人這樣說:I went to the bank with the intention of opening a bank account, but I forgot to take my ID card, so I couldn’t even do that. (我到銀行想要開戶,但我忘了帶身分證,所以沒開成);We have no intention of giving up. (我們沒有放棄的打算)。

Intent 和 intention 還有另一個重要差異,那就是 intent 亦可當形容詞用,而 intention 僅當名詞用。當形容詞用的 intent 意為「專注的;堅決的,下定決心的」,其後通常接介系詞 on + 動名詞/名詞,如 He’s intent on his work. (他正專心於工作);He was so intent on his computer magazine that he didn’t notice me come in. (他專心閱讀電腦雜誌,沒注意到我進來);He was intent on going abroad for advanced studies. (他一心想出國深造);She seemed intent on making me miserable. (她似乎一定要讓我痛苦)。

Horrible, horrific, horrendous, horrifying (adjs.)

這幾個形容詞都衍生自名詞 horror,後者意為「恐怖;恐懼」,如 horror film (恐怖片);因此,它們都有「可怕的,令人恐懼的或極討厭的」意思,但含意不盡相同。

Horrible 意為「可怕的;(人或物) 極討厭的,令人很不愉快的,糟透的」,如 a horrible traffic accident (可怕的交通事故);It is a horrible thing to see one person kill another. (看到一個人殺死另一個人的景象是件可怕的事);I’ve had a horrible day at work. (今天的工作令我很不愉快);Ugh! This coffee is horrible! (呃,這咖啡糟透了/呃,這咖啡好可怕)。

Horrific 意為「可怕的,令人恐懼的」,但並無「極討厭的,令人很不愉快的,糟透的」意思,如 The holocaust was the most horrific thing of the twentieth century. (大屠殺是 20 世紀最可怕的事);a horrific war/ illness (可怕的戰爭/疾病)。

值得注意的是,horrific 和 horrible 在「可怕的」意思上雖為同義詞,但 horrific 的語氣通常比 horrible 來得強烈;所以,a horrific war 所指的戰爭比 a horrible war 更可怕。此外,horrible 比較常用在日常生活的口說英語中,而 horrific 是個比較正式的字,一般大多出現在報章雜誌和書籍中,比較少用在會話中。

Horrendous 意為「可怕的,駭人的;(因太高、太大、太多等而) 令人吃驚的;糟透的」,如 She made a horrendous mistake. (她犯了一個可怕的錯誤);horrendous financial losses (驚人的財物損失);They work horrendous hours. (他們的工作時間長得驚人);The traffic this morning was horrendous. It took me seventy-five minutes to travel eleven kilometers. (今天早上的交通糟透了。我花了 75 分鐘才走了 11 公里)。

Horrifying 意為「令人恐懼的,令人驚駭的;令人極為討厭的,令人極為反感的」,如 It was a horrifying picture: The dead and the wounded had all been left by the roadside. (那是一幅令人驚駭的景象:死者和傷者都被棄置在路旁)。從上述可知,就 horrendous 和 horrifying 而言,horrifying 令人震驚的程度略高於 horrendous。

Ask, request, require, demand (vv.)

這四個動詞皆有「要求,請求」的意思,但它們的含意和用法不盡相同。Ask 是為了完成某事而口頭或書面向某人提出要求或請求最常用的字,長輩和晚輩以及上級和下級之間皆可使用,語氣較弱或者說比較客氣,如 I asked a friend of mine to help me. (我請求我的一位朋友幫助我);The teacher asked you to be present ( 老師要求你在場)。當不及物動詞用時,ask 與 for 連用亦意為「要求,請求」,表示想要得到某物,如 I asked for help. (我請求協助);She asked for a cup of tea. (她要求一杯茶)。

Request 則比較正式,語氣較強,指比較正式、比較有禮貌的請求,通常是你有權得到你所要求的,如 I requested assistance. (我請求幫助);They requested financial support. (他們要求資助);Many people have requested the next song. (許多人要求聽下一首歌);The letter requested us to leave the house within six weeks. (這封信要求我們在六週內搬出這棟房子)。

Require 是指根據需要、法律、協定、規章以及其他客觀情況所提出的要求,尤其是用在被動態,意為「要求;規定」,如 We require extra help. (我們需要額外的幫助);Silence is required of all examination candidates. (所有應試者都要保持安靜);I have done all that is required by law. (我已做到法律所要求的一切)。

Demand 的語氣更強,表示你有正當權利得到某事物所提出的要求,是指堅決或強烈地要求、理直氣壯地提出要求,而且堅持不讓對方拒絕要求或不會接受否定的回答,如 I demand my rights. (我要求應有的權利);The policeman demanded his name and address. (警察要求他說出姓名和住址);The dissatisfied customers demanded to see the manager of the store. (不滿的顧客要求見商店經理)。

在語法方面,這四個動詞都可接 that 所引導的名詞子句且在名詞子句中使用虛擬語氣 (subjunctive mood),即 (should) + 原形動詞。例如:

  • He asked that they (should) be allowed to use a dictionary. (他要求准許他們使用字典)。
  • The teaching staff requested that the principal should reconsider his decision. (全體教學人員請求校長重新考慮他的決定)
  • The director required that we should work all night. (主任要求我們通宵工作)
  • The boss demanded that John (should) finish it within a week. (老板要求約翰在一週內完成它)

Ask, request 和 require 都可以接受詞 + to do something,但 demand 則沒有這項用法。例如:

  • I asked her to get in touch with Mike as soon as possible. (我要求她儘快與麥可聯繫)
  • I requested him to come before nine. (我要求他九點以前來)
  • They required me to keep silence. (他們要求我保持沉默)

此外,require (不可用進行式) 後面可接動名詞,以主動形式表示被動,但 ask, demand 和 request 則無此種用法。Require 的這種用法與 need 和 want 等字的用法相同,它們後面可以接動名詞或不定詞被動態。例如:

  • My watch requires/needs/wants repairing. (我的手錶需要修理)
    = My watch requires/needs/wants to be repaired.

Mix, blend, combine, merge, mingle (vv.)

這幾個動詞均意為「混合」,其中以 mix 用得最為普遍。Mix 是指兩種或兩種以上的物質或物品混在一起成為一種混合物,其中各成分混合得很均勻、一致,很難分開,但多少仍保有原來的特性等,如 The baker mixed flour, yeast and water to make bread. (麵包師傅將麵粉、發酵粉和水混在一起來做麵包);The workmen mixed sand, gravel, and cement to make concrete. (工人把沙、石子和水泥混合成混凝土);Oil doesn’t mix with water. (油和水不能混合)。

Blend 通常指按一定比例混合調製出一種具有特殊味道、香氣或其他效果的混合物,其中各成分已不復單獨存在,但此混合物仍具有各成分的性質,如 I’d like to drink the whisky she blended. (我想要喝她調好的威士忌);You must blend the flour and eggs and sugar together before you make cakes. (你須先把麵粉、雞蛋和糖混合起來才能製作蛋糕);The sweetness of the yoghurt blends nicely with the sharpness of the lemons. (優酪乳的甜味和檸檬的酸味調和得非常好)。

Combine 是指將兩種或兩種以上的東西結合在一起,它們彼此結合或產生化學反應形成化合物,但仍保持自己的特性,並可在合適的條件下再度分離或分開,如 The two small shops combined to make a large one. (這兩家小店結合起來成為一家大商店);Hydrogen combines with oxygen to form water. (氫與氧化合成水);The minerals in hard water combine with soap to form a scum. (硬水中的礦物質與肥皂化合成浮渣)。

Merge 是指一種東西被另一種東西吸收而消失或兩種東西融合為一而各成分的特性均消失在整體中,如 the place where two roads merge (兩條路會合的地方);The insect merges with its surroundings. (這昆蟲與周圍環境融成一體);Small publishers were forced to merge with larger companies. (小出版社被迫跟較大的公司合併);Her work and life merge into one another. (她的工作和生活相互交織在一起);Our bank merged with theirs. (我們的銀行跟他們的合併了)。

Mingle 是指不同來源、不同顏色或不同溫度的液體混合在一起或指兩種東西,尤指情緒,混合後各成分仍保有各自的特性,能區別出來,如 The fresh water of the Amazon mingles with the salt water of the South Atlantic. (亞馬遜河的淡水和南大西洋的鹹水混合在一起);The waters of the two streams mingled near the bridge. (兩條溪流的水在橋的附近匯合了);It was a cry that mingled fright with surprise. (那是一聲夾著恐懼與驚訝的喊叫);Ted felt hope mingled with fear. (泰德感覺希望與恐懼交織在一起)。

Chunk, hunk, lump (nn.)

這三個名詞皆可用來表示物品的「塊」,但它們在大小、形狀和質料方面,概念並不相同。

Chunk 意為「大塊,厚塊」,是指形狀不平坦,可以切碎和分開的物品,且比較偏重「厚」的觀念,如 a chunk of cheese/cake/coal (一大塊起司/蛋糕/煤);a thick stew with chunks of meat and vegetables in it (用大塊肉和蔬菜熬煮的濃湯)。

Hunk 的含義與 chunk 相似,但專指可以分開和切開的食品,如 a hunk of meat/bread (一大塊肉/麵包)。

Lump 意為「小塊」,是指形狀不規則,尤指未經人為加工定形的物品,如 a lump of cheese/butter/meat (一塊起司/奶油/肉);a lump of metal/coal (一塊金屬/煤)。然而,必須注意的是,lump 還意為形狀和大小都有規則的「小方塊;方糖」,如 a lump of sugar (一塊方糖);Michael dropped two lumps of sugar into his coffee. (麥可在咖啡中放入兩塊方糖)。

由於 lump 是指比較小塊的物品,所以液體中的小塊狀物或是身體因患病或受傷而長出的腫塊,只能使用 lump,不可用 chunk 或 hunk,如 stir the sauce to get rid of any lumps (將調味醬攪拌一下,把裡面的塊塊攪散);The doctor found a lump in her breast. (醫生發現她的乳房有個腫塊);There was a lump on his head where the ball hit him. (他頭部被球擊中的地方腫了一個包)。

然而,雖然指物時是小塊的意思,但指人時,lump 卻意為心廣體胖的「大塊頭;傻大個」(a heavy person who is stupid and dull),如 You great lump! (你這個傻大個!)。最後值得一提的是,由 lump 所構成的一個成語,在英文中頗為常見,那就是 “(have) a lump in one’s throat”,意為「如鯁在喉;哽咽 (尤指悲痛得說不出話來)」,如 He had a lump in his throat as he said goodbye to his friend of 45 years. (他哽咽地向他 45 年的好友告別)。